Halloween type is by far my favorite.
Like the compulsory pooling of candy. No wealth gap between the parent who accompanies the child in bed, the little ones who do not work long enough and adults who spend up very late. All, even the parents have unlimited access to plates of sweets and so on until the volunteers of the Parish Food Drive ringing the doorbell to pick up what remains.
But this year, my girls want a Halloween capitalist. They want more freedom and reform, especially as regards the right to freely dispose of their collections. In other families, it is normal, they say, to seek profits and accumulate capital.
"What's the point of walking and work longer than others if everything is put together? It is where the advantage?"
"I do not want to run a Halloween family. I want to go with my friends who go to the wealthy neighborhoods that give more candy."
"It's always you, parents, who eat the best candy while you sleep! Adults should not be allowed to eat candy from children! "
solidarity imposed is completed.
I would therefore propose to leave aside the totalitarian Halloween family to turn to a Halloween more cooperative, where people gather freely to meet our common need for sweets. The sharing of surpluses would be a democratic manner. One member, one vote.
After all, what would happen to the member of the family who fall ill on the day of Halloween (there's always one)? No candy for him? And parents, they pay for costumes, accompany smaller and cut the pumpkin. Have they not entitled to them?
Insightful, Elder rejects the idea of a cooperative and suggests instead a Halloween that would ensure a minimum of social protection to the child who could not, for medical reasons only, trick or treat.
"Once collection is complete, we would give him candy and we do not want you to buy her chocolates and chips to complete."
A Halloween social democrat.
0 comments:
Post a Comment