officials Network collective Gaspésie have not already thought of all what they think Telus today.
So much so that after reading what I present below, we wonder what has been changed between the two parties. And this shift, the Network group, may explain the reasons for this unacceptable that we do not publicly disclose the agreement between them!
In reviewing the text by Gilles Gagné, I was reminded of this intervention the current public relations of the CRE, Benedict S. Pestle. The same guy who took them to Telus in 2006 made this year praised Telus
http://www.cre-gim.net/Actualites/communiques/Communique_2010/comm_20100429b.pdf . Amazing

It leaves a strange feeling all that! Turn the hood so puzzling. Why what was considered "too many benefits to the manager of the phone" is no longer so today? Therefore, the possibility to see if "open market, as small players could buy and resell bandwidth" has not been defended by Pilon, when we know that there still were some small players stand at the counter? Small players ready to take action and you have swept aside hand, without explanation!
these issues, and some others, have arisen in the circumstances. And they are suddenly particularly relevant in the context where the Network wishes to conceal from the public its agreement with Telus. It is assumed that smaller players must cross their fingers and wait anxiously to know why their Telus has gotten the drumstick ... uh, sorry, the pin!
Although anxious to see how the process will lead to Pascal Berube court access to information MP Matane refuses to consult the agreement on site .
And I 'm especially a political party finally bring order in this kind of thing when it comes to the public good!
A long saga is far from over! _________
In the notebook
A friend, a native of Tunisia, he returned home recently for a couple of weeks of vacation. When he told his friends and family that many places here were not high speed, everyone chuckled and asked: "Are you sure you live in Canada?". They were all infidels!
Laughter intensified when he told the exorbitant costs for a cell in Canada. Whose network is not available everywhere, for that matter. In Tunisia, just imagine, you walk into a grocery store, you pay $ 5, the cell is yours, and you can talk a few minutes after the transaction!
Honestly, what are all crying tears of our body, we pride ourselves that we so often been the vanguard of everything and ahead of those countries! Should perhaps stop always believe that we are a typical example for the world! It was good to eat crusts in many areas!
(The full text of what following is here:
http://lecartable.com/10/pdf/image-15.pdf
)
Excess slowness Thousands Gaspesians are deprived of high-speed Internet, even if the son spend a few yards from home Gagné, Gilles Editorial ![]() (...) Pilon believes that the contract signed between the collective Network Gaspésie and Telus, chosen as technical partner, gives too many advantages to telephone giant. * * * (...) A collective network? Finally, I told myself. I thought we would open the market, smaller players could buy and sell bandwidth, but no. We pay for a network, but was passed on to an exclusive high roller, Telus, which does not continue an approach to accessibility for people with his line. Telus continues to call for quotas of subscribers and leads too wide with the Network group. * * * (...) The contract between the collective and Telus Network enables the company to keep us scooter. http://bloglecartable.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default?alt=rss
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment