When the past catches up officials Network collective Gaspésie have not already thought of all what they think Telus today. So much so that after reading what I present below, we wonder what has been changed between the two parties. And this shift, the Network group, may explain the reasons for this unacceptable that we do not publicly disclose the agreement between them!
In reviewing the text by Gilles Gagné, I was reminded of this intervention the current public relations of the CRE, Benedict S. Pestle. The same guy who took them to Telus in 2006 made this year praised Telus
http://www.cre-gim.net/Actualites/communiques/Communique_2010/comm_20100429b.pdf
. Amazing
this release. To read it, one wonders how it is that makes CRÉGÎM and an apology for a company like Telus, so it should show restraint, or impartiality. This is the norm, it seems! The statement itself is signed by the spokesman of the contracting parties. Including, of course, the same guy who took them to Telus, 4 years ago.
It leaves a strange feeling all that! Turn the hood so puzzling. Why what was considered "too many benefits to the manager of the phone" is no longer so today? Therefore, the possibility to see if "open market, as small players could buy and resell bandwidth" has not been defended by Pilon, when we know that there still were some small players stand at the counter? Small players ready to take action and you have swept aside hand, without explanation!
these issues, and some others, have arisen in the circumstances. And they are suddenly particularly relevant in the context where the Network wishes to conceal from the public its agreement with Telus. It is assumed that smaller players must cross their fingers and wait anxiously to know why their Telus has gotten the drumstick ... uh, sorry, the pin!
Although anxious to see how the process will lead to Pascal Berube court access to information
MP Matane refuses to consult the agreement on site .
And I 'm especially a political party finally bring order in this kind of thing when it comes to the public good!
A long saga is far from over! _________
In the notebook
A friend, a native of Tunisia, he returned home recently for a couple of weeks of vacation. When he told his friends and family that many places here were not high speed, everyone chuckled and asked: "Are you sure you live in Canada?". They were all infidels! Laughter intensified when he told the exorbitant costs for a cell in Canada. Whose network is not available everywhere, for that matter. In Tunisia, just imagine, you walk into a grocery store, you pay $ 5, the cell is yours, and you can talk a few minutes after the transaction!
Honestly, what are all crying tears of our body, we pride ourselves that we so often been the vanguard of everything and ahead of those countries! Should perhaps stop always believe that we are a typical example for the world! It was good to eat crusts in many areas!
(The full text of what following is here:
http://lecartable.com/10/pdf/image-15.pdf
)
The Sun News, Sunday, April 16, 2006 Excess slowness Thousands Gaspesians are deprived of high-speed Internet, even if the son spend a few yards from home Gagné, Gilles Editorial (...) Pilon believes that the contract signed between the collective Network Gaspésie and Telus, chosen as technical partner, gives too many advantages to telephone giant. * * * (...) A collective network? Finally, I told myself. I thought we would open the market, smaller players could buy and sell bandwidth, but no. We pay for a network, but was passed on to an exclusive high roller, Telus, which does not continue an approach to accessibility for people with his line. Telus continues to call for quotas of subscribers and leads too wide with the Network group. * * * (...) The contract between the collective and Telus Network enables the company to keep us scooter. http://bloglecartable.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default?alt=rss
Pauline Marois blame Nathalie Normandeau and Laurent Lessard for the resignation of CEO Marcel Blanchet. If you understand something, teach me. |
It seems that Nathalie Normandeau have been disrespectful to the gentleman - hidden behind the institution - and that is why the frustrated kid leave office whose mandate is already completed three years .
Normandeau said that an overhaul of the electoral map is a "total failure", it does not insult Mr. Blanchet. It throws us in the face a clear statement, and I believed Ms. Marois sensitive, the institution as it is no longer responding to the call. It was also see all the players Gaspe (Mamelonet Georges, Nathalie Normandeau and Pascal Berube), get back to order by Mr. Blanchet. Politely, of course. But if the institution (the CEO) had itself had respect for parliamentarians, it would not constantly remind the legal aspect of the process. At one point as we had all wondered what could well serve the exercise of September 14!
There are more important to save as the CEO. The first institution is the people. What the people he respected the decision of the CEO, when we know that a member will have to cover a territory of 450 km?
The second institution, it is parliamentary. It was transformed into a circus by all parties, though one can give a perfect score by the Liberal Party which has consistently refused to answer questions properly.
Sometimes there are limits to intellectual demagoguery. Ms. Marois beyond them this time, wanting to enjoy excessive problems already too many PLQ! Sometimes in politics, that moderation is always in good taste and attracts as many voters as the soaping routine other parties!
View speeches from the Gaspé:
http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/video-audio/AudioVideo-32169.html
Cyberpresse article: CEO's Departure
: Marois blamed the Charest government As thanks, about 320 days later, he jumped into federal politics, opening the possibility of a costly election for his position in Haute-Gaspésie.
Allen Cormier The idea is simple enough. Being member of a party in power, he is convinced he will be better positioned to move the files. We've heard it often before him! And so he will hammer home during his campaign.
Yet we are told that the position of prefect is just useful because it allows the meeting with MPs and ministers from all parties, and so do advance more effectively the records of a region. There's a lot of saliva wasted for nothing in politics!
The chances of election
You can never say never in politics. Allen Cormier itself will not fail to remind those who speak of the benefit of the Bloc Québécois in the riding, he was going big loser last year, according to a survey Graffici. We can not say he has managed to completely turn things around, but we must still note that he was able to comb his opponent with 257 vote majority!
For now, as few strokes probe given here and there in the county, the benefit is even the Bloc Quebecois (between 42 and 45%) while the second is already causing a surprise. The Conservatives would float around 24 or 25% while the Liberal Party would be less than 20% (three different sources arrive at broadly similar results). An interesting match
All this announcement still an interesting game. Even if the chances of election for the Bloc remains high enough (after all, was elected Jean-Yves Roy, everyone criticized for its absence), it already seems to assume that all parties are strongly activated.
Recently, we saw Denis Coderre future "support" Nancy Charest. We also saw Senator Boisvenu alongside Allen Cormier. Same thing for Jean-Francois Fortin, who has been visited by Gilles Duceppe.
Clearly, we have probably never seen so many "courtiers" in our region. This is probably the best opportunity for our elected officials to extend the notebook applications! Hopefully they will be VERY active!
The final decision is not taken, in the case of Allen Cormier. Like when he ran the post of prefect, he seems to like to be desired. If we go by that, we can already say that the current is fooling around already confirmed his candidacy.
Extract audio from the news on Radio-Canada
http://bloglecartable.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default?alt=rss